The article examines theories of B.C. politics from the
perspective of the New Institutionalism. It argues
that the contributions of
Martin Robin’s class-based theory, Ed Black’s “politics of exploitation”
theory and Mark Sproule-Jones’s theory of sponsored conceptual ideology to
explaining the distinctiveness of B.C.’s political culture and its ideologically
polarized party system can best be understood in terms of their insights into temporal
processes, especially path-dependent
sequences of development. Although
growing
social and institutional pluralism are limiting the explanatory value of these
theories today, paying close attention
to the dynamics of
institutional development at work in contemporary BC can help us to identify
new reasons for thinking that the province’s unique politics will continue into
the future.
"B.C. Policy Perspectives" is the web log of Mark Crawford. THE PURPOSE OF THIS BLOG IS NOT PARTISAN OR IDEOLOGICAL. INSTEAD, I TRY TO IDENTIFY POSITIONS AND PERSPECTIVES THAT ARE NEGLECTED, DROWNED OUT OR UNDERREPRESENTED ELSEWHERE. Some politicians and journalists have found it helpful and interesting, and I hope that you do, too! This blog is linked to BOURQUE NEWSWATCH, THE TYEE, THE SIGHTLINE INSTITUTE, and The MARK NEWS. Check them out!!
Wednesday, March 07, 2012
Theories of B.C. Politics
What explains the distinctive nature of BC politics? Are the theories that were published half a century ago to answer this question still valid? If not, what are the prospects for a truly distinctive political system in British Columbia in the twenty-first century? If any of these questions interest you, you should take a look at my new article in the latest issue of BC Studies Number 172 (Winter 2011/12), pp. 77-104.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)