But what if that campaign seems never-ending, and the battles avoided include major issues
of the day and time- worn avenues of democratic accountability? I am referring of course to the prime
minister’s recent decision to not attend the traditional debates put on by the
consortium of Canada’s major broadcasting networks. These debates have become known as “the”
debates and one the key focal points of the election campaign: in 2011 the first
English-language debate drew 10 million viewers. The only problem, from Mr. Harper’s
perspective, is that he can’t control them. And that is why he prefers to have
a Google/Globe and Mail debate on the economy in Calgary and a Munk debate on
national security in Toronto instead. Smaller, more fragmented audiences
looking at debates focusing on his preferred agenda, in his preferred context, suits
him better.
By pulling out of the traditional consortium
debates, the government has cleverly conflated two issues: one is that the idea
of a broadcasting consortium effectively monopolizing and determining the
debate format is no longer acceptable; the other is that it is acceptable for
the government to unilaterally change the rules 5 months before an election.
The government pretends that the former consideration legitimates the latter;
it does not. All it suggests is that we should supplement the broadcasters’
debate with others, and then agree after the election to establish a Debates
Commission to set the rules for the following election.
Perhaps the prime minister’s audacity wouldn’t seem
so bad if it weren’t part of an even larger pattern of audacity that has
characterized his entire tenure in power. We don’t have First Ministers’
conferences anymore, even though healthcare reform and battling climate change
are of immense concern to Canadians and require a very high level of
federal-provincial coordination. We don’t have wide open press conferences anymore
either. Instead, we now have personal
attack ads between elections, prorogations of parliament whenever a government
is in danger of losing a vote of confidence, and omnibus budget implementation
bills as the primary vehicle for unpopular measures that are neither budgetary
nor about mere implementation. All of this
has become simply routine.
If Mr. Harper is rewarded with another majority and becomes
the most successful Conservative PM of modern times, his behavior will become
the template for Conservatives, the unspoken political playbook for all
politicians, and the 'new normal' for all young and immigrant Canadians, and
even for a large number of older Canadians who don't bother to remember the
honour system that once was. Is this the
role model we want for politics in the future?
No comments:
Post a Comment